This is actually not surprising at all. Behind its chic and fashionable design, there are a lot of dirty stories. Even iPhone 5s/c's promising finger print sensor is not really that promising.
This story shows that technically iPhone 5s/c is inferior to many other companies. Of course it won't stop iPhone from being the hot cake. It is always a question of presentation. In other terms, user experiences.
From another point of view, a manufacturer can "cheat" users with unnoticeable inferior or cheaper technologies. And this is exactly what Apple has been doing.
Spending about a year to design and manufacture a phone with inferior features is one good example.
The touchscreens on Apple's flagship iPhone 5s and mid-range iPhone 5c show significant degradation in touch detection accuracy along their edges, which can affect hitting outside keys on the iOS virtual keyboard, new test data shows.
OptoFidelity touch test
Green points indicate measurements within ± 1 mm. Red points indicate measurements in excess of 1mm. Black circles show the robot's touch point. | Source: OptoFidelity
Using a robotic finger and a specialized suite of test software, Finnish automated testing company OptoFidelity found that Apple's latest handsets accurately detect touch inputs only across a small swath of their displays, roughly equating to the location of the on-screen keyboard.
The iPhone 5s and 5c, according to the company, suffer from "extremely bad" touch performance near the edges of the display. This makes it difficult for users to hit outlying keys on the virtual keyboard, like Q, O, and P, the report says.
OptoFidelity touch test
Touch accuracy measurements overlaid on an iPhone 5s keyboard, top, and a Galaxy S3 keyboard, bottom | Source: OptoFidelity
OptoFidelity compared the iPhones' displays to that of Samsung's Galaxy S3 and found that the Korean phone offered significantly more accurate touch detection across its entire touch surface.
"Because the touch accuracy is more even in Galaxy S3 than in iPhone 5s and iPhone 5c, you get a lot less typing errors, and letters which are close to the edge are working better," the report said.
An example of OptoFidelity's testing system used on Windows 8 tablets
The test methodology considers a difference of less than one millimeter between the robot's reported position and the touch screen's reported position to be "accurate."
The analysis marks a change from 2010, when testing showed that the iPhone display was by far the most accurate among smartphones then available on the market. That test from three years ago was conducted by drawing lines on the screen, and measuring how straight they would be.
While the latest test suggests the outside of Apple's iPhone displays may experience inaccuracies, the iPhone still leads the way when it comes to responsiveness. One study published last month by Agawi found the iPhone 5 display to be twice as fast as competing Android-based handsets.
http://appleinsider.com/articles/13/10/25/robotic-testing-finds-touchscreen-inaccuracies-at-edge-of-iphone-display
登録:
コメントの投稿 (Atom)
0 件のコメント:
コメントを投稿